Laws against rape

 Rape law!
City (the original) Intermediate (including former Attorney Tianjin Branch), a branch of Tianjin procurator of Tianjin's Procuratorate. They took their own words and deeds of the Taiwan judicial disgrace.
accused person: Huang Deming, M 1945, strangers, scientific and technical personnel, Beijing Institute of Technology (now Beijing University of Technology) Department of Automatic Control 1969 graduate work in computer technology. living in Tianjin.
Contact Address: Tianjin Zip Code:
Tel: E-mail: wm601@126.com Phone:

evidence and the facts of a rape law is flawed legal system, to succeed so easily and shame tend to be the rule of law. rape law, facts! appeal hearing and the legal documents into another form of rape law, facts! my surprise Kong Gaoxin diversion by Zuigao Jian Tianjin to easily penetrate the barriers to justice prosecution system, the formation of the legal documents are irrefutable evidence!
irrefutable evidence as follows:
(86) Jin, and seized by the word v. No. 13 Heping District Prosecutor's Office br> (89) Jin Shen French word sentence three retrial Intermediate Tianjin No. 101 shame trap, multi-level judiciary had filed into the room dripping fluid performance (speech). seems limited use of intellectual rights (the appeal, petition, complaint), shame the stations).
wise French is by no means (single guide through the diode) is law enforcement only, but also law enforcement. You see, on their own network of.
three, supposedly, when the 2009 diverted to Tianjin's Procuratorate. This is such a good chance of error correction sense of shame. I patiently wait for a whole year, and certainly ignore the intellectuals. Zuigao Jian, but how to be poor, I did not know nor willing to speculate.
engage in science and technology for whom !
Although I willing to The third accused, true multi-judicial no-fault (perfect behavior), but still in the Communist Party was thrown into prison conditions, but still not anti-peace twenty years, to actually watch ripped through Zuigao Jian (National), listen to the words of the Communist Party of the consequences is to actually I have a dark feeling, with a slaughter of the feeling. Why it! Why ah!
four, once again some of the specific legal brief rape case.
copy of the Judgement, joke!) rape laws.
well known, To Data are not grounds of appeal without support ;
(2), when I say the defendant did not used to splurge Court red in the face to say a word.
(4), when I say sure, : with to avoid injustice.
justice at this time, there are two options, one, or return the first instance for retrial; second, or arrange for a lawyer again after hearing the appellant.
However, the Intermediate Court of Tianjin actually select the second instance of rape laws also expressed the smart aleck, The purpose of telling people (Reminder: To people do not know, they have done for!), driven by the loss of rational choice that you rape laws.
this God is the legal system, poor guilty conscience that you must cover (was drooling).
Open and clumsy smear the second trial final appeal system!
below will be through the control (within the file) evidence revealed have mounted a number of judicial justice shame Taiwan, but also let the Cable power company to pay back the bridge-hui charged 13,230 yuan concealed and unreported. In addition to preparing for the maintenance of which 8,820 yuan, Daipei fees, consignment fees will devour the rest of 4410 yuan has been normalized. ; back to charge 13,230 yuan consignment fee ! The children intelligence concealed and unreported money 13,230 yuan. In addition to preparing them 8820 yuan for the maintenance and Daipei fees, consignment fees will devour the rest of 4410 yuan has been normalized. Daipei costs published) was covered up.
surprised to be so ridiculous, But the reveal and the Procuratorate of Tianjin as the low-level intelligence of peace. very sad! when it again and again by the harbor when the three, is terribly low-level judicial.
legal document from the Judgement, c), some lie, not the party really is not a direct discovery and description. But the case is to control (within the file) the original evidence to let it betrays itself.
one: is deliberately lying, trying to hide something!
(1) The following evidence is obtained from the manufacturers (from the ; 85 on November 18 truthfully wrote Tianjin Hui Services Division Bridge Account. Huang pocketed two thousand four hundred and fifty yuan consignment fee. smart!
second trial, Tianjin Bridge-hui in the name of the United Industrial Company for the Great Wall, Beijing Cable plant affiliates Jiutai 0520A-type micro-computer. The yellow cable plant without authorization will be paid to Tianjin, Beijing Hui bridge which the United Industrial Company five installation, maintenance, sales agency cost of seven thousand three hundred and fifty yuan hui bridge into the Tianjin Science and Technology Services Account. Huang consignment fees pocketed two thousand four hundred and fifty yuan. ;, that this section is not a and Beijing, such as evidence that the transfer time is ) micro-computer to nine, is News contract (instead of the original signed The ; (after clearing my own things with the computer and left the company.)
Again, mysteriously! A guilty must be guilty, Fig.
look at the set up a face month November 18 (It is clear that a series of acts)
(3) said, National Day before the business are: A, signed nine computers and related (equipment) order contract; B, and the company balance sheet break; C, in consultation with users signed nine computers and related changes (equipment) order contract; D, urging users to exchange money; E, to contact the user to Beijing factory from delivery; F, to help the user installation and commissioning; G, inform the Department of consignment manufacturer rebate (agency fee), and so a series of acts.
2085 when I was alone, Beijing, Tianjin between ; manufacturers, users running around, as evidence that it is more than a month, to be honest, really I am burnt. the light on in terms of workload, which earn more than the consignment agency fees, I have taken for granted.
case using the I could not complete the initial days of business! can be done? kidding! I was human flesh, not Superman!
Second, look at the certainly no such evidence within
file evidence, the law needs to rape, to ) on the nine computers in the contract is signed before and after the two editions (the original check and change), the original contract (the two sides broke up because of changes in intermediary) after consultation with the user canceled. now closed in the file after the changes between the two sides broke the contract (the most important change is to cancel the contract company as intermediary) to it as ; admissible. Intellectuals have the money belongs to all of a sudden it will because of . but we live in a modern. I use the evidence and facts to expose practices pen knife.
use their own money into corruption, the judicial mood to laugh joke people! is nothing to fear and to be wise and right to the inevitable results! sad! ridiculous ! more terrible!
(4) also say, in order to which clearly expressed with great reluctance), it is difficult to imagine. Buzhi Chi at that level to actually read the testimony to me. It is also within the file. That is the can make rape law always legal. ought to be ashamed! I repeat: it is still a witness!)
(5) and then by the way, they know I have repeatedly asked the company's interests with the redistribution of evidence an oral agreement, had fun I as follows, in April 1985 I put out to sea with the United Industrial Corporation, Tianjin Bridge hui has verbally agreed: absolute domination. oral agreement the two sides had not consciously rational behavior, only intellectuals have the name the case is not primarily relied on.)
to mention similar agency sales occurred many times within the company, according to the principle of redistribution of the two sides over the profit distribution and the whole in mind the account. why making things up , injustice how to start the
1986 I was using an account that go. to cooperate with the investigation to prove me guilty, I provide 85 years in April since the sea all the business of documentary evidence (including all ;. (the Justice is so dark, dare to facilitate access to justice rape laws, rape laws are so easy and easy to succeed. It seems, even with the !)
later, arrested me, and engage in issues with my computer and as tools of crime to be confiscated.
six, the case exposed the !
1, my appropriate (in their words and deeds that they lose eligibility).
I see: From the rape of so many laws concerning the judiciary in Tianjin (and staff), I am afraid of its impact and danger of judicial re-segregation is inappropriate. Zuigao Jian make your own involvement in Beijing for the final judicial hearing. Feijun none other.
2, despite two decades, the case is still simple plot. precisely because abuse case, surprisingly, it is foolish to expose the darkness of justice case.
I see no need to go to war, as long as the volume of evidence on the table in, face to face verification and challenge of intellectuals Huang Deming enough to negate the wronged. and check the ulterior purpose and insider, and within the existing judicial and non-performance is your normal relations (Attorney) for further investigation, and I do not have to worry about (can be provided with sufficient evidence and facts).
(1) access to (86) Jin French word sentence contracting Intermediate Court of Tianjin No. 585, It is no ground of appeal does not support Heping District Procuratorate on the 13th, Power cable provided by the Beijing Hui company to pay back the bridge charged 13,230 yuan concealed and unreported. In addition to preparing for the maintenance of which 8,820 yuan, Daipei fees, consignment fees will devour the rest of 4410 yuan has been normalized. paragraph 13,230 yuan, Hui Yuan bridge into the Tianjin Science and Technology Services Account. , for my calculations are clearly aware, because after I did not After looking over, only a rough (know) ten thousand dollars has already earned the money. Exactly how many will be calculated to go.)
(3) access to (86) Jin and inspection No. 13 by the word v. Heping District Prosecutor's Office document business and wired according to the agreement by Beijing's power to pay back the bridge-hui charged 13,230 yuan concealed and unreported. In addition to preparing for the maintenance of which 8,820 yuan, Daipei fees, consignment fees will devour the rest of 4410 yuan has been normalized. The fees is wrong.
(4) access to the evidence file, you can find out after the incident, (through the freezing and seizure) the actual control of a total of contracting Intermediate Court of Tianjin No. 585 words the treasury. The remaining (8350-2450) was processed separately.
including the implementation of the (86) Jin French word sentence contracting Intermediate Court of Tianjin No. 585, Judgement, ; stolen money, personal desires stood.
certainly the case metadata, starting in 1986 with criminal point (at the time as a starting point of 2,000 yuan) are not enough. Therefore, this case is even more wrong.
(6) access to files within the testimony, as Liu Hongyan, Li Yiwu testimony clearly expressed reluctance . testimony is invalid. trial, I am very sorry. But I must speak, and my impact on the national conscience! my actions on the company a clear conscience! my behavior to the user a clear conscience! my behavior on my conscience clear conscience! My only guilty of is my love, when she could not move due to work injury, I ran out to engage in technology hh Intellectuals can only sit and suffer injuries. My statement is the most articulate description I am not guilty.
Tianjin Intellectual Huang Deming Thank you so much judicial officers (the judiciary) the real show (now), they raped the law , also provides clear evidence that much. for the Chinese created a judicial case can not be asked without fear, the right to be wise in the case. (in case I replaced the Reform of Science and Technology)
with the victim You show rape laws, I've had enough!
laws against rape, one to the facts, second, evidence, third, courage. The fact is that you ; Evidence is also provided to me by you; courage is the country I believe, I believe that the party, believe that the law.
Tianjin Huang Deming October 10, 2010